Friday, December 5, 2025

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Stormy Daniels: ‘I’m Significantly More Crazy Now,’ Admits Being Sexual Aggressor With Trump, Told Story to ‘Make Some Money.’

Stormy Daniels, the pornographic film actress at the center of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s prosecution against former President Donald Trump, is emblematic of the stereotypes attached to her industry. A lengthy biographical sketch published in New York Magazine‘s Intelligencer reveals a woman motivated by a need for constant attention, greed, petty vindictiveness, and — by her own admission — mental illness.

In her own words, Daniels contradicts her recollection of events surrounding her alleged affair with former President Trump. She plays up fictitious threats and carefully assumes the role of someone who faced grave injustice — despite no crime ever being committed against her. The National Pulse has pulled some of the more relevant passages that shed important light on the motivations and dubious credibility of Stormy Daniels.

“I’M SIGNIFICANTLY MORE CRAZY.”

In a 2023 interview, shortly after former President Trump was charged with falsifying business records to cover up alleged “hush money” payments to Daniels just days before the 2016 election, the porn actress acknowledged that her mental health had declined. “I’m significantly more crazy now than I was before,” Daniels said.

The adult film industry has been accused of routinely taking advantage of women with untreated mental health issues. A 2011 psychiatric study comparing women in the porn industry with the average woman in California found a stark deviation in mental health. One-third of respondents in the adult film industry met the criteria for a depression diagnosis. Just 13 percent of women in California met the same criteria overall. Additionally, women in the porn industry were by and large more likely to have experienced poverty, sexual abuse, and other forms of violence than the average woman in California.

“MAKE SOME MONEY.”

Former President Trump and his allies have long contended that Daniels had engaged in a celebrity extortion plot as she saw an opportunity for a financial windfall with his presidential campaign. Daniels admits as much in her court testimony, confirming to Trump’s defense attorney, Susan Necheles, that she was motivated to “Get the story out and make some money.”

The National Pulse has reported that Daniels’s original attorney, Keith Davidson — who negotiated the alleged hush money payment with disgraced lawyer Michael Cohen — is a well-known entertainment industry shakedown artist. Davidson has represented several unsavory characters who’ve peddled sex tapes and lurid stories of celebrity trysts, all to make a buck. In 2018, Davidson was fighting at least three lawsuits against him over alleged extortion plots.

CHANGING HER STORY. 

Daniels’s recollection of events has changed over time. The newest iteration, as The National Pulse reported on Tuesday, suggests her encounter with the former President was nonconsensual, with Daniels telling the court that Trump was bigger than her and alluding to the power dynamic between the two. However, prior tellings paint a very different picture.

The porn actress claimed in the past that she was the aggressor. New York Magazine notes: “[S]he recounts details about insulting him, or making him change out of his pajamas, or instructing him to bend over so she could spank him… she had thought of her standoff with Trump as a battle of egos between two equals, and she had felt that she had won.”

A VICTIM WITHOUT A CRIME.

One of the most bizarre aspects of Stormy Daniels’s public persona has been her insistence she’s the victim of grave injustice. “Her mind-set is that this is a justice system that hasn’t protected her, and yet she’s here spending her money, her own time, and taking time off work and risking her safety to show up for a legal system that didn’t show up for her,” a friend of the adult film actress told New York Magainze. Daniels has foregone government-provided security and relied instead on her long-time bodyguard, claiming she doesn’t trust the government to protect her — what she needs protection from isn’t clear.

This victim mentality played out during Tuesday’s cross-examination of Daniels by Trump’s defense attorneys. “He prevailed, but I was not found to have lost,” the porn actress insisted when asked why she still has not paid Trump legal fees as part of a judgment against her over several failed lawsuits against the former President.

The closest Daniels has ever come to actually detailing a crime against her was a claim she made on the witness stand Tuesday that she was approached by a man in a parking garage in 2011 and told to stop discussing her story. By her admission, Daniels never told her husband, daughter, or anyone else of the alleged threatening encounter. Nor did she report the threat to police.

By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
More From The Pulse

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

The DOJ Is Investigating This College for Spending Taxpayer Money on Illegal Immigrants, Punishing Whistleblowers.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has launched an investigation into the College of DuPage (COD) for allegedly using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and punishing students who speak out against it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the DOJ, the College of DuPage, and students allegedly affected by the college’s policies.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The investigation was launched on December 2, 2025, and pertains to actions at the College of DuPage, Illinois, following reports received by the DOJ in recent months.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice.” – Harmeet Dhillon

🎯IMPACT: The DOJ has warned that federal funding could be pulled from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

IN FULL

The Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation into the College of DuPage in Illinois, following reports that the institution is using taxpayer funds to support illegal immigrants and penalizing students who oppose these actions. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon outlined the allegations in a formal notice to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem and Education Secretary Linda McMahon.

According to Dhillon, the college has allegedly provided resources and support to illegal immigrants, including an “Undocumented Student Liaison” dedicated to assisting them. The college’s website also reportedly offers a Frequently Asked Questions section that appears to guide readers on evading immigration enforcement.

The College of DuPage, the largest public community college in Illinois, has been accused of violating the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), which restricts illegal immigrants from accessing most taxpayer-funded benefits. Additionally, the college is alleged to have provided alternate Social Security numbers to illegal immigrants to access taxpayer benefits.

The letter further claims that the college is in violation of 8 USC 1373 by allegedly providing staff and students with information on how to obstruct immigration enforcement actions. Earlier this year, the DOJ announced that federal funding would be withdrawn from public institutions found to be unlawfully aiding illegal immigrants.

“Reports allege that COD illegally provides public tax support for illegal aliens and unconstitutionally punishes students who speak out about this illicit practice,” Dhillon wrote, formally referring the allegations to the Departments of Homeland Security and Education for investigation.

Image by Steve Fernie.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Rwanda and Congo Sign Historic ‘Washington Accords’ at Trump Peace Institute.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo signed a peace agreement aimed at resolving conflicts in eastern Congo.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, President Félix Tshisekedi of Congo, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Thursday at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path, yes. Indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point.” – President Tshisekedi

🎯IMPACT: The agreement aims to ease conflict in eastern Congo, improve humanitarian conditions, and expand U.S. access to critical minerals.

IN FULL

The leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo formally signed the “Washington Accords” peace agreement at the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace on Thursday, a venue newly renamed in honor of the American president. Under the terms of the landmark deal, the two African nations agree to observe a permanent ceasefire and disarm the militia proxies operating in the contested territories along their border.

President Trump hosted Rwandan President Paul Kagame and Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi as they signed the accords, which formalize terms the two leaders agreed to in Qatar this past June. As part of the deal, the United States has committed to purchasing rare earth minerals from both nations.

“Today, the United States is also signing our own bilateral agreements with the Congo and Rwanda that will unlock new opportunities for the United States to access critical minerals and provide economic benefits for everybody,” President Trump said, receiving praise from both African leaders. Kagame noted, “We have seen countless magicians and efforts, but none has succeeded in resolving the underlying issues. President Trump introduced a new and effective dynamism that created the space for breakthroughs.”

“I do believe this day is the beginning of a new path, a demanding path. Yes, indeed, quite difficult. But this is a path where peace will not just be a wish, an aspiration, but a turning point,” Tshisekedi added.

The conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda has roots in the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and accusations of cross-border militia support. Congo alleges Rwanda backs the M23 rebel group, while Rwanda claims Congo harbors militias hostile to its government. The violence has displaced millions and drawn international concern, with some observers accusing Rwanda of a land grab to secure additional rare earth mineral deposits located in the contested territory.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Zelensky’s Jet Escapes Collision with Four Drones Near Ireland: Report.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Irish authorities are investigating four drones that appeared to follow or attempt to intercept Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s plane as it arrived in Dublin.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Irish authorities, and unidentified drone operators.

📍WHEN & WHERE: December 1, during Zelensky’s state visit to Ireland.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” – Volodymyr Zelensky.

🎯IMPACT: The drones breached a no-fly zone and raised concerns over security, though Zelensky’s visit proceeded safely.

IN FULL

Irish authorities are investigating an incident in which four drones appeared to shadow or intercept the plane of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as it landed in Dublin during his first official state visit to Ireland. According to reports, the drones breached a no-fly zone that had been established for his flight path, raising serious concerns about their origin and purpose.

Witnesses say the drones, which reportedly had their lights on, hovered for up to two hours above an Irish warship deployed for protection. Observers estimated the drones had taken off northeast of Dublin and reached the point where Zelensky’s plane would have touched down, had it arrived on schedule. The ship lacked the capability to disable them, and Irish warplanes did not intervene. Authorities are examining whether the drones could have been launched from an undetected vessel at sea.

The Óglaigh na hÉireann (Irish Defense Forces) stated that, for “operational security reasons,” it could not discuss the specifics of any alleged incident.

In a post on X following the visit, Zelensky thanked the Irish people and government: “Ukraine deeply appreciates the support and assistance of the Irish people and government… We discussed steps toward ending the war with a guaranteed peace for Ukraine and all of Europe.” He also praised Ireland’s role in supporting Ukraine’s path toward European Union (EU) membership.

The drone incident in Dublin comes amid heightened scrutiny of unmanned aerial operations targeting high-profile figures. Earlier this year, a military commander in Russia claimed that drones targeted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s helicopter during a visit to the Kursk region. The commander said the aircraft was in the “epicenter” of the attack and that Russian air defense forces neutralized the drone before it could reach the flight path. No damage or injuries were reported.

Meanwhile, Kiev and its international partners appear to be inching closer to a diplomatic resolution. According to recent reporting, Ukraine has accepted the core terms of a U.S.-backed peace framework, developed in Geneva, Switzerland, signalling a potential turning point in the nearly four-year war with Russia.

Image via the Houses of the Oireachtas.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Appeals Court Upholds Trump’s National Guard Deployment in D.C.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A U.S. appeals court paused a lower court’s order to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., allowing President Donald J. Trump to continue the deployment.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, and National Guard troops from multiple states.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The appeals court decision was issued on December 4, regarding National Guard deployments in Washington, D.C., which began in August.

🎯IMPACT: The decision allows Trump to maintain and increase troop deployments in Washington and potentially other cities, despite legal challenges from Democrats.

IN FULL

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit lifted a lower court injunction that would have required President Donald J. Trump to end the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. by December 11. With the lower court order removed, the deployment of Guardsmen as part of a crime crackdown in the nation’s capital will continue until at least February 2026.

Issuing an abbreviated ruling, the three-judge appellate panel noted that their decision “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” and is intended to give the court time to consider the case. In its appeal of the November 20 injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb—a Joe Biden appointee—the Trump administration cited the Thanksgiving Eve terrorist attack against two National Guard members in Washington, D.C. that left one dead and the other in critical condition. Following the attack, President Trump ordered an additional 500 troops to be deployed to the city.

The lawsuit was filed by District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D), who accused Trump of unlawfully taking control of the city’s law enforcement and violating laws prohibiting federal troops from performing domestic police work. Judge Jia Cobb had previously ruled the deployment likely unlawful and temporarily blocked it, but allowed time for an appeal.

Democrat lawmakers have attempted to push back against similar troop deployments in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, calling them politically motivated shows of force. Legal challenges persist, with the U.S. Supreme Court expected to weigh in on the broader issue of National Guard deployments in cities such as Chicago.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Tim Walz Complains That Calling Him Retarded Will Lead to Violence.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) is worried that people calling him “retarded” could lead to violence.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Tim Walz, President Donald J. Trump, and people calling Tim Walz retarded.

📍WHEN & WHERE: Walz expressed his concerns at a press conference on December 4.

💬KEY QUOTE: “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people.” – Tim Walz.

🎯IMPACT: Walz’s comments come despite much of the political violence in 2025 and 2024 being carried out by far-left extremists, such as the assassination of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassinations of President Trump.

IN FULL

Minnesota Governor and failed 2024 vice presidential candidate Tim Walz (D) has complained that people are driving by his home and calling him a retard, claiming that such language could lead to violence, just days after President Donald J. Trump referred to him as “retarded.” During a press conference on December 4, Walz claimed, “This creates danger,” adding, “I’d never seen this before. People driving by my house and using the r-word [retard] in front of people. This is shameful.”

Walz further complained that he has yet to see any elected Republicans agree with him that such behavior is “shameful,” saying, “I’m worried. We know how these things go. They start with taunts, and they turn to violence.”

The comments come just days after President Trump referred to Walz as “seriously retarded” on Truth Social last week, following reports of Somali migrant crime, including accusations of over a billion dollars in fraud. “Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for ‘prey’ as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone,” President Trump said.

“The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both,” he noted.

The corporate media attempted to make President Trump walk back the comments aboard Air Force One on November 30, but the President doubled down, saying, “Yeah, I think there’s something wrong with him, absolutely, sure.”

He then referred to the Somali fraud case, where some money defrauded from U.S. taxpayers may have ended up funding the Islamist al-Qaeda franchise al-Shabaab. “Anybody that would do what [Walz] did, anybody that would allow those people into a state and pay billions of dollars [to] Somalia… It’s not even a country, because it doesn’t function like a country. It’s got a name, but it doesn’t function like a country. Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

Notably, hundreds of government workers in Walz’s own administration have accused him of covering up fraud by Somalis and retaliating against whistleblowers.

Image by Gage Skidmore.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Town Votes Against Expansion of Islamic Academy.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A zoning board in Hoover, Alabama, unanimously rejected a proposal to relocate a Muslim K-12 school after a heated meeting.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission, local residents, and representatives of the Islamic Academy of Alabama.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The meeting took place this week in Hoover, Alabama.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s not about religion. It’s about traffic.” – Jeff Wilson, the Hoover resident who initiated the petition opposing the relocation.

🎯IMPACT: The proposal now moves to the Hoover City Council for a final decision.

IN FULL

Residents of a city in Alabama packed a local zoning board meeting this week in opposition to a proposal to relocate an Islamic school to their town from a nearby municipality. The Hoover Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 against rezoning property currently used for office space to accommodate the Islamic Academy of Alabama, currently located about 12 miles away in the city of Homewood.

Concerns about traffic congestion, adherence to long-term city development plans, and the precedent such a zoning change might set were cited as reasons for the decision. However, pressure from around 200 citizens attending the meeting likely had a significant impact on the zoning board’s decision.

A petition opposing the plan gathered over 1,700 signatures. “It’s not about religion,” said Jeff Wilson, a resident who initiated the petition, “It’s about traffic.” Meadowbrook resident Nancy Cooper also pointed out that six schools already serving more than 5,600 students feed traffic into Highway 119, often turning it into “a parking lot.”

However, some attendees expressed concerns beyond infrastructure. Signs warning of an Islamic “100-year plan” and comparisons to Muslim-dominated Dearborn, Michigan, were seen. One speaker said Muslims had implemented a “long-term cultural takeover” in Britain, drawing applause from some attendees. Commission Chairman Mike Wood interrupted, stating, “We are here to look at whether this school was appropriately placed. We’re not here for that. I’m sorry. We’re not going to listen to that.”

While Monday’s vote is advisory, the final decision now rests with the Hoover City Council, which will review the proposal in the coming weeks.

Image by Don Sniegowski.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Trump Announces Major Changes to Immigrant Work Permits.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced a reduction in the validity period of work permits for certain immigrants, cutting it from five years to 18 months.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joe Edlow, and immigrants filing for work permits.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The policy announcement follows the deadly terrorist attack on National Guard troops in Washington, D.C.

💬KEY QUOTE: “It’s clear that USCIS must enforce more frequent vetting of aliens. All aliens must remember that working in the United States is a privilege, not a right.” – Joe Edlow

🎯IMPACT: The new policy aims to enhance vetting opportunities and ensure stricter oversight of immigrant work permits.

IN FULL

President Donald J. Trump announced on Thursday that his administration will move to shorten the validity period for work permits issued to certain immigrants present in the United States. The move follows the deadly terrorist attack against National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., last month.

Under the new policy, immigrants who apply for asylum or other humanitarian designations will only be able to obtain a work permit valid for 18 months. Previously, the permits were valid for five years.

The Trump administration contends the shortened period of validity will allow officials to conduct more frequent revetting of immigrants. “It’s clear that USCIS must enforce more frequent vetting of aliens,” U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joe Edlow said, adding: “All aliens must remember that working in the United States is a privilege, not a right.”

Notably, the work permit changes come as President Trump ramps up sweeping changes to the U.S. immigration system. The National Pulse reported on Wednesday that the Trump administration is preparing to expand its travel bans to include as many as 32 additional countries. According to a State Department cable, the proposed expansion under current consideration could add dozens more nations to the list of “countries of concern.”

Officials argue the additional restrictions are needed because some countries “lack a competent or cooperative government authority to produce reliable identity documents,” or have histories of visa overstays, producing national security threats, or inadequate cooperation in repatriating citizens ordered removed from the U.S.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Pro-Sharia ‘EPIC City’ Rebrands as ‘The Meadow’ After State and Local Backlash.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: A planned “1,000-home Muslim city” in Texas is sparking concerns about Sharia law amid an attempted rebrand by its planners.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The East Plano Islamic Community (EPIC), its cleric Yasir Qadhi, Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R), and counter-extremism analyst Sam Westrop.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The proposed site is located northeast of Dallas, Texas, with construction planned for 2026 or 2027.

💬KEY QUOTE: “Qadhi and his mosque, EPIC, have radicalised generations of Muslims not just in the Dallas area, but across the U.S.” – Sam Westrop

🎯IMPACT: The development, located approximately 40 miles northeast of Dallas, would include 1,000 residential properties, a mosque, Islamic schools, medical clinics, retail outlets, parks, and an elderly care home. While no permits have been filed and construction has not yet begun, organizers have reported strong initial interest in the properties.

IN FULL

A Texas Islamic organization is rebranding a planned “1,000-home Muslim city” after facing significant local opposition and criticism from state lawmakers. The East Plano Islamic Community (EPIC) initially named the project “EPIC City,” but has rebranded it as “The Meadow,” though the housing development remains under state scrutiny.

“One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion,” Governor Greg Abbott (R) said when he signed legislation banning discriminatory residential developments that require homeowners to adhere to Sharia law. He continued: “Another issue at stake is what is called the right to contract. The fact is that religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas.”

After the bill signing, the organizers behind EPIC City moved to rename the project, though its ties to Islamic extremists remain a concern for state officials and nearby residents. Concerns have only increased after recordings from 2001 surfaced of Yasir Qadhi, a cleric linked to the project, expressing extremist views in the early 2000s. In one recording, Qadhi stated, “This is a part of our religion, to stone the adulterer and to kill, by the way, the homosexual. This is also our religion.” He added that such punishments should not be carried out in America but indicated that they would be implemented under an Islamic state. Other recordings revealed Qadhi dismissing the Holocaust as “false propaganda.” Yasir Qadhi has since acknowledged his past statements, calling them a “one-time mistake” made when he was “young and naïve.”

The development, located approximately 40 miles northeast of Dallas, would include 1,000 residential properties, a mosque, Islamic schools, medical clinics, retail outlets, parks, and an elderly care home. While no permits have been filed and construction has not yet begun, organizers have reported strong initial interest in the properties.

Counter-extremism analyst Sam Westrop with the Middle East Forum warns that the project could serve to “radicalise future generations of Muslims” and argues EPIC is seeking to “advance Sharia and other theocratic threats away from the checks and balances of Texas law and order.” EPIC, however, has described itself as a “multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multilingual, non-sectarian, diverse, and open community” that welcomes non-Muslims.

The National Pulse reported in October that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) revealed that entities linked to the EPIC land development project breached federal and state securities laws. The Attorney General requested that the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) review the findings and refer the case back to his office for further legal action.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Senate Democrats Reveal Plan to Keep Obamacare on Life Support.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: Senate Democrats unveiled a plan to extend expiring Obamacare subsidies for three years without reforms, but Senate Republicans are unlikely to support it.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), and other Senate Republicans and Democrats.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The proposal was announced on Thursday, with a vote expected next Thursday, December 11, in the U.S. Senate.

💬KEY QUOTE: “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.” – Chuck Schumer

🎯IMPACT: The debate over the subsidies could affect healthcare premiums and whether reforms like income caps or abortion funding restrictions are included.

IN FULL

Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), revealed on Thursday their legislative proposal to extend Obamacare subsidies for three years without any changes or reforms. Schumer announced the legislation on the Senate floor, stating, “This is the bill, a clean, three-year extension of [Obamacare] tax credits that Democrats will bring to the floor of the Senate for a vote next Thursday. And every single Democrat will support it.”

Republicans, however, are already balking over the lack of reforms in the proposal. They have advocated for measures such as income caps and restrictions to prevent taxpayer dollars from funding abortions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) indicated a willingness to consider proposals, but a bipartisan compromise has yet to emerge.

Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Mike Crapo (R-ID) have been working on a Republican alternative, which centers on redirecting subsidy funds into Healthcare Savings Accounts (HSAs) rather than paying insurance companies directly. Despite discussions during a closed-door meeting this week, no unified Republican strategy has been finalized.

Schumer warned that failure to pass the Democrats’ plan could lead to significant premium increases for Americans starting in January. He stated, “If Republicans block our bill, there’s no going back. We won’t get another chance to halt these premium spikes before they kick in at the start of the New Year.”

The Senate is expected to vote on the proposal by December 11, as Congress races to address a range of legislative priorities before the year ends.

Image by Adrian Hon.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.

WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.

Alleged January 6 Pipe Bomber’s Family Are Democrat Donors.

PULSE POINTS

WHAT HAPPENED: The family of January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr. are donors to the Democratic Party, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records.

👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr., his father Brian Cole Sr., and Tennessee Democrat state Representative Vincent Dixie.

📍WHEN & WHERE: The pipe bombs were planted at the DNC and RNC on January 5, 2021, with Cole Jr. being arrested on December 4, 2025.

🎯IMPACT: An individual who is either Brian Cole Jr. himself or his father, Brian Cole Sr., contributed $3,000 to Vincent Dixie, a Democrat state Representative in Tennessee. Meanwhile, Cole Jr. has been “linked to statements in support of anarchist ideology.”

IN FULL

The family of January 6 pipe bombing suspect Brian Cole Jr. are donors to the Democratic Party, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. An individual who is either Brian Cole Jr. himself or his father, Brian Cole Sr., contributed $3,000 to Vincent Dixie, a Democrat state Representative in Tennessee. Meanwhile, Cole Jr. has been “linked to statements in support of anarchist ideology.”

Business records associated with the Cole family’s address show Brian Cole Sr. runs an immigration bond company currently operating under the name Statewide Bonding Inc., though it appears there are prior iterations of the company under different names. In April 2025, Cole Sr. was barred from writing bonds in the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District of Tennessee after a state appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that Cole and an employee had been untruthful in their testimony to the court and failed to disclose prior bankruptcies.

Immigration bonds, such as those issued by Cole Sr.’s company, operate similarly to traditional bail bonds in criminal proceedings. An immigration bond is a financial guarantee posted by a friend, family member, or bail bondsman to ensure a detained immigrant will appear at all future immigration hearings. This allows the individual to be released from immigration detention while their case is ongoing. The bond amount varies and is determined by factors like flight risk and danger to the community.

Notably, from 2019 to 2021, Cole Sr. was party to a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleging that the department’s administration of immigration bonds, including issuing incomplete Notice to Appear (NTA) forms and failing to send copies to bond guarantors, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and due process rights. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately threw out the lawsuit.

Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.

show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.